List of all exhibits. Click on one of them to go to the exhibit page. The topics allow exhibits to be selected by their concept categories. On the right, you can choose the settings of the list view.

The list below shows links between exhibits in a non-standard way. The points denote the exhibits and the connecting lines are connections between them, according to the selected categories.

Enter the end dates in the windows in order to set the period you are interested in on the timeline.

Views: 7324
(Votes: 2)
The average rating is 5.0 stars out of 5.
Print metrics
Print description

The picture depicts Prince Władysław Sigismund Vasa, later Władysław IV Vasa, the King of Poland. It was painted by an unknown artist of Rubens' circle, and it repeats the pattern established by Rubens in other similarly composed equestrian portraits he painted (i.a. the portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1602, Florence, the Palazzo Vecchio; the portrait of Duke of Lerma, 1603, Madrid, the Museo del Prado).

more

The picture depicts Prince Władysław Sigismund Vasa, later Władysław IV Vasa, the King of Poland. It was painted by an unknown artist of Rubens' circle, and it repeats the pattern established by Rubens in other similarly composed equestrian portraits he painted (i.a. the portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1602, Florence, the Palazzo Vecchio; the portrait of Duke of Lerma, 1603, Madrid, the Museo del Prado).
The prince is portrayed with the symbols of a commander – holding a commander's baton in his right hand and with a red sash on his shoulder. Shown in the background is a panorama of the military camps of Polish, Lithuanian, Zaporozhian, and Turkish armies during the victorious Battle of Chocim in 1621. This equestrian portrait of Prince Władysław is not, as it was previously believed, a depiction painted during his famous journey to the Low Lands (1624), although the Prince's face is modelled on his portrait created in Rubens' atelier during this journey (currently this painting is part of the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, deposited in Wawel Royal Castle).
In the 19th century, the painting was in private collections in England (H. Metcalfe's, Bousfield's, Smith's). By 1914, it was bought by Sir Francis Cook for his collection at Doughty House, Richmond. Next, it was bought by Andrzej Ciechanowski of London, and then it was owned by Julian Godlewski of Lugano, who donated it to the Wawel Royal Castle collection in 1977.

Elaborated by Joanna Winiewicz-Wolska PhD (Wawel Royal Castle), editorial team of Małopolska’s Virtual Museums, © all rights reserved

less

Ruben’s innovations

Peter Paul Rubens developed a new type of equestrian portrait. The system that had been used up until then, in the Titian tradition (Horse portrait of Charles V), depicted a rider on a horse in profile. Rubens changed this, depicting the figure and mount slightly turned en trois quarts in a short perspective, so that they seemed to be heading directly towards the viewer.

more

Peter Paul Rubens developed a new type of equestrian portrait. The system that had been used up until then, in the Titian tradition (Horse portrait of Charles V), depicted a rider on a horse in profile.

Equestrian portrait of Zygmunt III, Peter Paul Rubens workshop, ca. 1619, source: Wikipedia, Public domain

Rubens changed this, depicting the figure and mount slightly turned en trois quarts in a short perspective, so that they seemed to be heading directly towards the viewer. The whole composition changed: the horse is shown in an elegant, free walk, not as before in a gallop, while the rider is presented from the front, thanks to which his face is far more visible, and the silhouette adopts a dignified and reliable look, with the chest stuck out and hand resting on a baton.
The first picture of this type was the equestrian portrait of Archduke Albert, known from Jan Brueghel’s Cabinet of curiosities  Allegory of Sight. This type has become a role model in Rubens workshop, used in paintings such as Equestrian portrait of Sigismund III Vasa and Equestrian portrait of Prince Lerma. These were often copied by artists from his circle, as in the presented painting, Equestrian portrait of Prince Sigismund Vasa, from the collection of Wawel Royal Castle – State Art Collection.

See also:

Statuette “Napoleon on a Horse” by Piotr Michałowski
Sculpture of Augustus III

Who deserved equestrian portrait?

 

 

Elaborated by Paulina Kluz (Editorial Team of Małopolskas Virtual Museums),
Licencja Creative Commons

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Poland License.

Bibliography:
Ryszard Szmydki, Artystyczno-dyplomatyczne kontakty Zygmunta III Wazy z Niderlandami Południowymi, Lublin 2008.


 

less

Who deserved an equestrian portrait?

The equestrian portrait, from the beginning of its existence, was supposed to emphasise the military virtues of the individual depicted and was reserved for victorious leaders. Alexander the Great was already shown as an equestrian figure, and Hellenic rulers followed his example by having statues depicting them on horseback erected. This form of commemoration was adopted from Greeks by Romans, and their monument of Emperor Marcus Aurelius became a model for all medieval and renaissance representations of the mounted victor. It is worth noting that this statue — despite being made of valuable bronze — was preserved due to the fact that, for a long time, it was thought not to be the image of a pagan emperor-philosopher, but rather the portrait of Constantine the Great, considered a Christian.

more

The equestrian portrait, from the beginning of its existence, was supposed to emphasise the military virtues of the individual depicted and was reserved for victorious leaders. Alexander the Great was already shown as an equestrian figure, and Hellenic rulers followed his example by having statues depicting them on horseback erected. This form of commemoration was adopted from Greeks by Romans, and their monument of Emperor Marcus Aurelius became a model for all medieval and renaissance representations of the mounted victor. It is worth noting that this statue — despite being made of valuable bronze — was preserved due to the fact that, for a long time, it was thought not to be the image of a pagan emperor-philosopher, but rather the portrait of Constantine the Great, considered a Christian.

The revival of the monumental equestrian statue was brought about by the Renaissance (it was then that famous monuments, such as the Gattamelata in Padua and the statue of Bartolomeo Colleoni in Venice, were created), but it reached its heyday between the 16th and the 18th centuries. In addition to the very expensive monumental bronze statues, small statuettes, coloured paintings and engravings appeared, whose propagandistic meaning as the first mass medium can hardly be overstated. At the same time, depictions of members of the royal families on horseback began to appear.

Polish kings also had equestrian portraits made for them. Magnates, and most often — understandably — victorious hetmans, followed the example of their rulers. However, the equestrian portrait was not always created in honour of individuals who triumphed duringwar. It sometimes happened that an equestrian depiction was the effect of its founder’s megalomania. Hieronim Florian Radziwiłł — a cruel and foolish man, whose only military success was the bloody suppression of a peasants’ revolt — intended to have a mounted statue of himself situated at the marketplace in Biała Podlaska, rebuilt especially for this purpose. The project assumed an impressive outcome, but, then again, Radziwiłł’s ambitions were nothing to scoff at either: he was convinced that he would become the king, having been told so by a Gypsy fortune teller...

The targets of the equestrian portrait were the broad masses of noblemen, even though it was mostly associated with the elite. Even a moderately wealthy nobleman, although, in the light of the law, equal to the magnates, could not afford even the cheapest and humblest equestrian image of his person. Funding such a portrait would be considered a ridiculous attempt to compare oneself to senators and hetmans. Because, in the end, quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi, or, as some prefer, “Gods may do what cattle may not”.

The place, where even the king walks on foot

Jan Długosz—describing the life and customs of King Władysław Jagiełło — stated that “depending on the circumstances, sometimes it was difficult to approach him, at other times, it was easy”. He was most accessible and accommodating to petitioners while sitting on the toilet, when he “went from his bed to a secluded place and defecated for a long time there, handling many affairs. And, apparently, he was never more accessible and gentler. And the knights strove to find such moments to make it easier for them to get what they had asked for”.

Sigismund I the Old, had a very different approach towards these matters and, as stated by Marcin Kromer, “throughout his life he was characterized by a great, almost virgin-like shyness. He hated it when anyone apart from those who served him in the inner-bedroom saw him naked or taking care of his natural needs”.

See:
Painting “Equestrian portrait of Prince Władysław Sigismund Vasa”
Sculpture of Augustus III
Statuette “Napoleon on a Horse” by Piotr Michałowski
Ruben’s innovations

Elaborated by Adam Spodaryk (Editorial team of Małopolska’s Virtual Museums), 
Licencja Creative Commons

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Poland.

Bibliography:
Mieczysław Morka, Polski nowożytny portret konny i jego europejska geneza, Warszawa 1986.

less

Painting “Equestrian portrait of Prince Władysław Sigismund Vasa”

Pictures

Links

Game


Recent comments

Add comment: